Exercise 4a Paragraph 1: Where does term “three strikes law” come from? This term come from of rule in baseball. Paragraph 2: Is this law always interpreted in the same way? No, this law has its own interpretation and means in each estate. Paragraph 3: Does the three strikes law work as a deterrent? Yes, this law is based on the principle that criminals will go to a prison when they have three crimes.
Exercise 5a 1. In which US state did the crimes happen? California 2. What was the criminal’s third conviction for? Leandro Andrade stoles video tapes from a different store. Jerry William with a friend stole a slice of pizza from a group of children. Santos Reyes was sentenced for taking the written part of a Californian driving test for his cousin. 3. Did the crime involve any violence? No, it didn’t. 4. What previous crimes had the person committed? Leandro Andrade committed theft. Jerry William has previous convictions for robbery and car theft. Santos Reyes had a burglary charge for stealing a radio and later a robbery charge. 5. Is the person still in prison? Yes, Leandro Andrade and Santos Reyes are still in prison.
a.Yes, it does b.In California c.The term comes from baseball d.No, it’s not. Each state has its own interpretation
Exercise 5ª.
1.The crimes happened in California 2.The third conviction of each one are: steal video tapes, steal a slice of pizza and take the written part of a driving test. 3.No, it didn´t. 4.The previous crime were: Theft and burglary (Leandro), robbery and car theft (Jerry), and burglary and robbery (Santos). 5.Leandro and Santos are in still in prision.
Ex 5a Page 29 1. The crimes happened in California. 2. The third crime of Leandro was to steal video tapes. The third crime of Jerry was to steal a slice of pizza. The third crime of Santos was to take the written part of a driving test. 3. The crimes did not involve violence. 4. The previous crimes of Leandro were: theft and burglary. The previous crimes of Jerry were: robbery and car theft. The previous crimes of Santos were: burglary and robbery. 5. Leandro and Santos still in prison. Jerry is not in prison.
5. 1. In California 2. The third crime of Leandro was to steal video tapes. 3. no it did not 4. Leandro committed theft.Jerry has previous convictions for robbery and car theft. Reyes: burglary charge for stealing a radio and robbery charge.
Exercise 5.a 1) The crimes happened in California 2) Leandro Andrade was convicted for stealing video tapes, Jerry Williams for stole a slice of pizza, and Santos Reyes for taking the written part of a Californian driven test for his cousin. 3) The crimes didn't involve violence. 4)Leandro Andrade had previus convictions for theft and burglary, Jerry Williams had conctions for robbery and car theft, and Santos Reyes had a juvenile burglary charge for stealing a radio and a robbery charge. 5) All of them are in prison now
1. In California 2. Leandro Andrade stoles 5 children's video tapes.Jerry Williams stoles a slice of pizza. Santos Reyes stoles the written part of a Californian driven test for his cousin. 3. No, it didn't 4.Leandro Andrade had previous convictions theft and burglary. Jerry Williams had previous convictions for robbery and car theft. Santos Reyes had previous convictions stealing a radio and a robbery charge. 5. Leandro Andrade and Santos Reyes are in prison but Jerry Willians is free now.
Reading page 28. Answers Part. 4 a) I think the rule of the three strikes law doesn't work as a deterrent.
b) In California USA the three strikes law has been working well.
c) The term three strikes law comes from the rules of baseball game, the player can misses two balls, but if he misses the third, he is out of the game.
d)In USA this law is interpreted in different ways depending of the state where applies it. Twenty/six states have this law.
e) I think the prisoners who play baseball will know this rule better and can put it in practice in their lives.
READING PAGE 29. PART 5.
1) The crimes happen in California USA.
2) The criminal's third conviction was against Santos Reyes who falsified the written part of a California driving test of his cousin, who couldn't read.
3) No, the three crimes didn't involve violence fortunately.
4) Leandro Andrade had previous convictions for theft and burglary. Jerry Williams had previous conviction for robbery and car theft. Santos Reyes had previous convictions, a juvenile burglary charge for stealing a radio and later a robbery charge.
5) Yes the three prisoners are in prison still, because they lost their appeals. Their lawyers are complaining against the sentences.
Exercise 5 (Leandro Andrade) 1. The crimes happened in California 2. He stole four video tapes. 3. No, it didn’t. 4. He had previous convictions for theft and burglary. 5. Yes, it is.
Exercise 4a. Choose the best questions from a-e for paragraghs 1-3
Paragraph 1: Question C : Where does the term "three strikes law" come from?
Paragraph 2: Question D : Is this law interpreted in the same in the same way?
Paragraph 3: Question A: Does the three strikes law work as a deterrent?
Exercise 5a.
1. In which US State did the crime happen? R/ In California.
2. What was the criminal´s third conviction for? They were sentenced to 25/26 years to life, but in Jerry Williams´s case, the sentence was readjusted to 6 years.
3. Did the crime involved any violence? R/ These crimes didn´t involved any violence.
4. What previous crimes hand the person committed? Leandro Andrade commited theft and burglary. Jerry Williams committed robbery and car theft. Santos Reyes committed stealing a radio and a robbery charge.
Hello, guys: These are my answers:
ResponderBorrarExercise 4a
Paragraph 1: Where does term “three strikes law” come from?
This term come from of rule in baseball.
Paragraph 2: Is this law always interpreted in the same way?
No, this law has its own interpretation and means in each estate.
Paragraph 3: Does the three strikes law work as a deterrent?
Yes, this law is based on the principle that criminals will go to a prison when they have three crimes.
Exercise 5a
1. In which US state did the crimes happen? California
2. What was the criminal’s third conviction for?
Leandro Andrade stoles video tapes from a different store.
Jerry William with a friend stole a slice of pizza from a group of children.
Santos Reyes was sentenced for taking the written part of a Californian driving test for his cousin.
3. Did the crime involve any violence? No, it didn’t.
4. What previous crimes had the person committed?
Leandro Andrade committed theft.
Jerry William has previous convictions for robbery and car theft.
Santos Reyes had a burglary charge for stealing a radio and later a robbery charge.
5. Is the person still in prison? Yes, Leandro Andrade and Santos Reyes are still in prison.
Regards, Tania
Exercise 4ª.
ResponderBorrara.Yes, it does
b.In California
c.The term comes from baseball
d.No, it’s not. Each state has its own interpretation
Exercise 5ª.
1.The crimes happened in California
2.The third conviction of each one are: steal video tapes, steal a slice of pizza and take the written part of a driving test.
3.No, it didn´t.
4.The previous crime were: Theft and burglary (Leandro), robbery and car theft (Jerry), and burglary and robbery (Santos).
5.Leandro and Santos are in still in prision.
Ex 4
ResponderBorrarPage 28
1 C
2 D
3 A
Ex 5a
Page 29
1. The crimes happened in California.
2. The third crime of Leandro was to steal video tapes. The third crime of Jerry was to steal a slice of pizza. The third crime of Santos was to take the written part of a driving test.
3. The crimes did not involve violence.
4. The previous crimes of Leandro were: theft and burglary. The previous crimes of Jerry were: robbery and car theft. The previous crimes of Santos were: burglary and robbery.
5. Leandro and Santos still in prison. Jerry is not in prison.
4 a. 3
ResponderBorrarC. 1
d. 2
5. 1. In California
2. The third crime of Leandro was to steal video tapes.
3. no it did not
4. Leandro committed theft.Jerry has previous convictions for robbery and car theft. Reyes: burglary charge for stealing a radio and robbery charge.
Exercise 4.a
ResponderBorrar1) c
2) d
3) a
Exercise 5.a
1) The crimes happened in California
2) Leandro Andrade was convicted for stealing video tapes, Jerry Williams for stole a slice of pizza, and Santos Reyes for taking the written part of a Californian driven test for his cousin.
3) The crimes didn't involve violence.
4)Leandro Andrade had previus convictions for theft and burglary, Jerry Williams had conctions for robbery and car theft, and Santos Reyes had a juvenile burglary charge for stealing a radio and a robbery charge.
5) All of them are in prison now
4a)
ResponderBorrar1. c
2. d
3. a
5a)
1. In California
2. Leandro Andrade stoles 5 children's video tapes.Jerry Williams stoles a slice of pizza. Santos Reyes stoles the written part of a Californian driven test for his cousin.
3. No, it didn't
4.Leandro Andrade had previous convictions theft and burglary. Jerry Williams had previous convictions for robbery and car theft. Santos Reyes had previous convictions stealing a radio and a robbery charge.
5. Leandro Andrade and Santos Reyes are in prison but Jerry Willians is free now.
Reading page 28. Answers Part. 4
ResponderBorrara) I think the rule of the three strikes law doesn't work as a deterrent.
b) In California USA the three strikes law has been working well.
c) The term three strikes law comes from the rules of baseball game, the player can misses two balls, but if he misses the third, he is out of the game.
d)In USA this law is interpreted in different ways depending of the state where applies it. Twenty/six states have this law.
e) I think the prisoners who play baseball will know this rule better and can put it in practice in their lives.
READING PAGE 29. PART 5.
1) The crimes happen in California USA.
2) The criminal's third conviction was against Santos Reyes who falsified the written part of a California driving test of his cousin, who couldn't read.
3) No, the three crimes didn't involve violence fortunately.
4) Leandro Andrade had previous convictions for theft and burglary. Jerry Williams had previous conviction for robbery and car theft. Santos Reyes had previous convictions, a juvenile burglary charge for stealing a radio and later a robbery charge.
5) Yes the three prisoners are in prison still, because they lost their appeals. Their lawyers are complaining against the sentences.
Exercise 4
ResponderBorrar1 C
2 D
3 A
Exercise 5 (Leandro Andrade)
1. The crimes happened in California
2. He stole four video tapes.
3. No, it didn’t.
4. He had previous convictions for theft and burglary.
5. Yes, it is.
Exercise 4a.
ResponderBorrarChoose the best questions from a-e for paragraghs 1-3
Paragraph 1: Question C : Where does the term "three strikes law" come from?
Paragraph 2: Question D : Is this law interpreted in the same in the same way?
Paragraph 3: Question A: Does the three strikes law work as a deterrent?
Exercise 5a.
1. In which US State did the crime happen?
R/ In California.
2. What was the criminal´s third conviction for?
They were sentenced to 25/26 years to life, but in Jerry Williams´s case, the sentence was readjusted to 6 years.
3. Did the crime involved any violence?
R/ These crimes didn´t involved any violence.
4. What previous crimes hand the person committed?
Leandro Andrade commited theft and burglary.
Jerry Williams committed robbery and car theft.
Santos Reyes committed stealing a radio and a robbery charge.
Christian Páez Páez
ResponderBorrar#4
1-c
2-d
3-a
#5-a
CASE 1-Leandro Andrade
1)In which US state did the crimes happen?
The crimes happened in California.
2)What was the criminal’s third conviction for?
The criminal’s third conviction was stealing four more video tapes.
3)Did the crime involve any violence?
The third crime didn’t involve any violence.
4)What previous crimes had the person committed?
He stole five children’s video tapes and he went into a building illegally and stole things.
5)Is the person still in prison?
Yes, he’s still in prison.